There are a lot of people walking around with a badge, a carry permit, or both, who have never actually been taught to shoot. They’ve been taught to qualify. Those are not the same thing.
Paul Costa has spent nearly two decades in law enforcement watching that gap up close. As an assistant range master responsible for firearms training for over 700 officers, he had a front-row seat to what institutional training produces: people who can pass a course of fire on a known range, under no stress, with no time pressure that matters, and who haven’t meaningfully developed as shooters in years.
He decided somebody needed to close that gap.
The Institutional Training Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About
Paul Costa isn’t speaking from the outside looking in. After seven years managing ranges and training patrol officers, responsible for firearms qualifications for over 700 officers, he moved into special operations, where he’s spent the last twelve years as a full-time special operations canine handler. High-risk warrant service, hostage rescue, barricaded subject incidents, and fugitive apprehension with federal and local SWAT teams across the Tri-State area. He’s a deputized U.S. Marshal Task Force Officer. He’s worked alongside DEA and FBI regional teams.
He’s also watched officers go through qualification after qualification without meaningfully improving as shooters — and that bothers him.
“They need it,” he says of law enforcement training. “It requires guys with this knowledge to start putting it out there so we can change the overall capabilities of our protectors.”
The competitive shooting world has spent decades conducting rigorous, data-driven research into how humans can be trained to shoot faster and more accurately.
Most police departments haven’t kept pace. The result is officers who can pass a qual course and not much else.
What Competition Actually Teaches You
A few years ago, Costa started competing in USPSA. Within a year, he climbed from unclassified to Master Class in Carry Optics, the 85th to 94th percentile of competitive shooters nationwide. He currently shoots at least one match per month across USPSA, PCSL, and Hit Factor formats.
That’s not a humble brag. It’s a data point.
Costa didn’t pursue competitive shooting to collect trophies. He pursued it because he understood something that a lot of people in the defensive firearms world miss: competition is a pressure-tested laboratory for developing real skill, and the lessons it generates are directly applicable to anyone who carries a gun for serious purposes.
“Speed and accuracy are not competing concepts,” he says. “People view them as one or the other. We show them how both can be accomplished at the same time. Just because you’re shooting fast doesn’t mean you can’t be accurate — and that’s exactly what’s required when you’re using these guns in a defensive capacity.”
This is the kind of thing that sounds obvious until you realize how many programs are still teaching people to choose between fast and accurate, as though marksmanship is a binary dial rather than a skill with a ceiling worth pursuing.
Costa’s approach is to apply competitive training methodology, the stuff that actually works, to the people who actually need it: cops, SWAT operators, military personnel, and armed civilians who take their responsibility seriously.
Process Over Outcome
One thing Paul emphasizes that’s worth sitting with: the goal isn’t a rank or a classification. The goal is a process.
“Master Class is essentially top ten percentile across all of competitive shooting. Grand Master would be great, but it’s not necessary. I got the ranking I wanted to establish, and now I try to stay process-oriented and let the chips fall where they fall.”
That mindset, drilling down on fundamentals, trusting the process, letting performance metrics emerge from good practice rather than chasing them directly, is the same framework he brings to instruction. He’s not teaching people to game a qual course. He’s teaching them to actually shoot.
He also teaches students to understand their own shooting. To develop awareness. To identify what they’re paying attention to and why. The goal is for students to be able to diagnose their own errors and train themselves effectively when no instructor is around, because the instructor won’t be there when it counts.
Why This Matters
The Second Amendment community talks a lot about being prepared. About taking responsibility for your own safety. About not being a soft target.
Most of that talk doesn’t get followed up with the work.
Firearms training, real training, not just putting holes in paper at 7 yards, is where it’s at. Understanding the mechanics of your trigger press, building a draw that’s consistent under stress, learning to move and shoot without compromising accuracy: these are skills. They’re learnable. They require instruction from people who actually know what they’re doing.
Paul Costa is one of those people. He’s still on the job full-time, still competing monthly, and still instructing for Achilles Heel Tactical on top of all of it, logging thousands of miles to put quality training in front of the people who need it most. He is adamant on one point above all others: if a law enforcement officer ever finds themselves in the middle of a violent encounter, they deserve every possible advantage. Better training doesn’t just produce better shooters. It keeps cops alive.
The capability gap in how we train armed Americans, law enforcement, and civilians is a real problem. Instructors like Paul are among the people trying to close it.
If you carry a gun, you owe it to yourself to train with someone who’s actually developed a methodology worth following.
Not someone who took a class once and started teaching. Someone who has tested their approach operationally, refined it competitively, and built a track record of producing capable shooters.
More Training Resources on TTAG:
Read the full article here
