Ruling gives a victory to American energy producers as well as the Trump admin, which sought to get case tossed
The Supreme Court of Maryland dismissed three lawsuits from Democratic-led jurisdictions that sought to hold oil and gas companies accountable for climate change, striking a blow to a coordinated legal effort to force energy producers to pay billions of dollars in weather-related damages nationwide.
The 3-2 decision, written by Justice Brynja Booth, determined the lawsuits brought by the City of Baltimore, Anne Arundel County, and the City of Annapolis improperly sought to use state law to “regulate air emissions beyond their jurisdictional boundaries.” Baltimore, Anne Arundel, and Annapolis argued that the defendants, more than two dozen oil companies, including BP, Chevron, and ExxonMobil, violated nuisance laws by selling products that generated carbon emissions and, in turn, led to costly weather events harming their residents.
Booth wrote that federal law alone applies to cases related to interstate pollution. “No amount of creative pleading can masquerade the fact that the local governments are attempting to utilize state law to regulate global conduct that is purportedly causing global harm,” wrote Booth, who later added that seeking to use state courts to reduce worldwide greenhouse gas emissions “is so far afield from any area of traditional state or local responsibility that it cannot be seriously contemplated.”
The ruling hands a decisive victory to oil and gas companies, which argued that such litigation could dismantle the industry by forcing it to pay tens of billions of dollars in damages. It also marks a victory for the Trump administration, which filed a brief last year asking the court to dismiss the cases. “[Federal law] contemplates no role for states reaching out and applying their law in other states,” the brief stated.
The three lawsuits, which were filed between 2018 and 2021, are part of a broader coordinated effort from dozens of Democratic-led cities and states, which have filed identical lawsuits against many of the same oil and gas companies in local courts across the country. More than a quarter of the American population lives in a jurisdiction that is pursuing similar litigation.
States including California, Delaware, Hawaii, Minnesota, and New Jersey, and cities including Chicago, Honolulu, San Francisco, and New York have each filed such lawsuits, some of which, like Honolulu’s, are farther along and marching toward a potential trial. The Supreme Court is slated to hear another, filed by the City of Boulder, Colo., in the coming months.
The majority of cities and states involved in the effort, including the City of Baltimore, employ the same outside law firm, the San Francisco-based Sher Edling, which is funded by left-wing environmental nonprofits.
“We agree with Justice Killough’s dissent when he states clearly and plainly that, ‘The Majority’s conclusion that these cases are tantamount to emissions regulation is not a finding—it is a prediction about what discovery would show, dressed up as a legal conclusion and deployed to close the courthouse door before discovery could confirm or refute it. That is not how motions to dismiss work. And it is not how preemption analysis works,'” Sara Gross, Baltimore City Department of Law’s chief of the affirmative litigation division, said in a statement.
Annapolis did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Anne Arundel declined to comment.
Read the full article here
