NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
CHICAGO – The journalists behind the bombshell book about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline continue to face tough questions about the media’s failure to report on it sooner.
Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, the co-authors of “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” appeared in Chicago as part of their book tour and were confronted with an audience question submitted by Fox News Digital about the reckoning the media has been facing in recent weeks and months regarding their role in the Biden scandal.
“I mean, it was a failing of the press,” Thompson responded Thursday. “‘I’d say, on the most basic level, if the press was completely on this story, then the debate would not have been such a shock.”
BIDEN BOOK AUTHOR REVEALS HOW WHITE HOUSE STAFF TRULY FELT ABOUT KARINE JEAN-PIERRE AS PRESS SECRETARY
The Axios reporter insisted newsrooms aren’t a “monolith” and dismissed the notion that there was any coordination between news outlets in covering up for Biden, jokingly telling the Windy City crowd “they can’t even plan a happy hour.”
“There are a lot of really great reporters and there are a lot of great reporters in the Biden White House,” Thompson said. “And it does frustrate me a bit when there’s this broad brush painted by, in my opinion, some bad-faith right-wing people trying to be like, ‘They were all in the tank.’ That being said, I do think there were a few things going on that allowed some reporters to miss this. One is, I do think some people let their own personal ideological leanings affect how they reported.”
“The other thing I will say about the D.C. sort of circuit beyond reporters – D.C. is a liberal town. It didn’t always use to be, but it is now. And if you are an aggressive, tough, fair reporter on Donald Trump, you get snaps all around town. If you are invited to every single garden party… You don’t get as many yes snaps when you’re covering Obama or when you’re covering Biden,” he continued, adding that the “social incentives” change between covering the Trump administration and covering the Biden administration.
CNN’S TAPPER RIPS MEDIA SMEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUR, WSJ ON BIDEN DECLINE WITHOUT MENTIONING OWN NETWORK
“It’s a complicated question,” Tapper chimed in. “Yes. I wish I had been more aggressive about it, but I will say when we started writing this book after Election Day 2024, we did not know what we were gonna get or how many people were gonna talk to us… We talked to more than 200 people. And we were surprised at what we learned. Like we did not know that some of this dated back to 2015 after the tragic loss of his son Beau.”
“And so the idea is that this was all just sitting there waiting for the reporting, I wish it was so, it is not true,” Tapper said.
While the CNN anchor conceded that “right-wing media” was right in calling out Biden’s cognitive decline before the rest of the legacy media, he swiped that sharing viral videos of Biden over the years isn’t “investigative journalism.”
“If any of those outlets actually published any investigative journalism that had cabinet secretaries as we do, or senior White House staffers as we do, etc., saying these things as opposed to just pointing and laughing at him, then maybe I would be more receptive to the argument from them, ‘Oh, we all knew this as we reported it at the time,’” Tapper said.
SHIELDING BIDEN: JOURNALISTS SHED LIGHT ON THE MEDIA’S COVER-UP OF A WEAKENED PRESIDENT
When asked what their takeaways from their reporting and the entire Biden saga were, Thompson called out journalists who rely on a “moral calculus” when determining whether to cover a major political story.
“If reporters are doing a moral calculus, or they start doing some weird calculus where ‘If I report this, would it help Trump and that’s gonna be bad or good,’ that is an endless path that I don’t think reporters should be trying to do,” Thompson said. “The job and the reporting is, is this true? Can we report it? And it’s really up to the country to decide what to do with that reporting. I think sometimes reporters get caught up in thinking about the externalities and the consequences of putting this out into the world.”
“There are always going to be bad-faith people and bad-faith politicians that are gonna take the reporting and skew it and use it for their own partisan purposes. But if you start thinking that way in saying like, ‘Oh, I don’t want to report something that’s true because bad-faith people are gonna take advantage of it,’ I think you just end up in this, like, bad cul-de-sac,” he continued.
Read the full article here
